State v. Autry
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the district court seeking dismissal of the charges against him. Respondent asserted that the state’s delay in filing the criminal complaint would deprive him of his constitutional right to a fair trial under the Fifth Amendment. The district court granted respondent’s petition. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the district court erred in issuing the writ of habeas corpus. Therefore, we reverse and remand this case for further proceedings.
THE FACTS
On January 30, 1987, the state filed a criminal…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Hill v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Koller v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Sheriff v. RoylanceNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- CAMACHO (OCEAN) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.