DuBose v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea of one count of battery with the use of a deadly weapon. He now contends that the plea was infirm on the ground that it was made without an affirmative showing that he understood the nature of the offense to which he was pleading guilty, as is required by Hanley v. State, 97 Nev. 130, 624 P.2d 1387 (1981). We agree.
In Hanley v. State, supra, we held that a guilty plea record *340must affirmatively show “either. . . that the defendant himself (not just his attorney) understood the elements of the offense to which the plea was entered or .. .…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Hanley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Standen v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
4Cited by3 opinions
- Iverson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Iverson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Michael Ray Hogan v. Jeremy BeanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025