Legal Opinion

Twietmeyer v. City of Hampton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 27, 1998No. Record 971042PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser

This appeal involves the validity of an interim ordinance adopted by the City of Hampton to impose a stormwater management fee on real property owners. Gregory M. and Rita F. Twietmeyer (the Twietmeyers) refused to pay the fee. They contend that the ordinance does not base the fee on a property’s contribution to stormwater runoff, and thus, does not comply with the enabling statute, Code § 15.1-292.4.1 Because the Twietmeyers failed to overcome the ordi*389nance’s presumption of validity, we will affirm the circuit court’s judgments against the Twietmeyers.

I

Code § 15.1-292.42 authorized local…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Violett v. City Council of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Weber City Sanitation Commission v. CraftSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Tidewater Ass'n of Homebuilders, Inc. v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. National Linen Service Corp. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  5. City of Virginia Beach v. Virginia Restaurant Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Gainesville v. STATE, DOTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Beck v. SheltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  3. Estes Funeral Home v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  4. Mountain View Ltd. Partnership v. City of Clifton ForgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  5. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. ThorsenFairfax County Circuit Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API