Legal Opinion

McKean v. Massey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Linn District Court. Action to vacate and annul certain deeds of conveyance, and to compel defendants AquillaB. Massey, Anna R. Massey and Geo. A. Crawford, to convey certain lands to the plaintiff, Wm. R. McKean, as trustee for himself and others.

Read the full summary

Error from Linn District Court. Action to vacate and annul certain deeds of conveyance, and to compel defendants AquillaB. Massey, Anna R. Massey and Geo. A. Crawford, to convey certain lands to the plaintiff, Wm. R. McKean, as trustee for himself and others. The petition alleged the same facts respecting the Montgomery Town Company, the interest of plaintiff in the premises, and the relation sustained by defendant Crawford to said Town Company, and the entry of the land, as set forth in the preceding case of McKean v. Crawford, Swifle,et al.,{ante, p. 112.) It stated that defendant Aquüla B.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sahford, J.:

The principal facts of this case, as shown by the record, are very similar if not almost identical with those found to exist in the case of this same plaintiff in error, against Crawford, Swifle, and others, which has been decided by this court, at the present term. The conclusion of law also, which was found by the referee and sustained by the court below, is substantially the *125same, and based upon like premises, as in tbe case referred to. . So far then, as the two cases are alike in respect to the matters named, the conclusions reached by…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oaks v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Johnston v. Winfield Town Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API