United States v. Crosby
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
This is one of those oft occurring cases where a fundamental question arises which must have been answered over and over again but where no reported decision can be found which gives the answer.
The Government wishes to proceed with a trial of an indictment which names several individuals and a corporation, Texas-Adams Oil Company, Inc. The corporation has been summoned pursuant to Rule 9(c) (1) F.R.Crim.P. It has defaulted in appearance. The Government moves for the appointment of some one to represent the corporation.
Rule 43 provides that the defendant must be present…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Brandstein v. White Lamps, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RiveraDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996
- Schreibman v. WALTER E. HELLER & CO., ETC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1978
- United States v. Holy Land Fdn for ReliefCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Holy Land Fdn for ReliefCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.