Legal Opinion

Wilson & Co. v. Hershkowitz

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 2, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

Section 764 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by chapter 279 of the Laws of 1936, provides in substance for the issuance of execution against the person “ by a judge or justice of a court of record only.”

A general provision of the Civil Practice Act is applicable to the Municipal Court unless the same matter is regulated by provisions of the Municipal Court Code or the rules of that court. (Mun. Ct. Code, § 15.)

In courts of record generally, prior to the 1936 amendment the attorney for the judgment creditor, under judgment enforcible by execution, could issue execution against the person…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Historical Society, Inc. v. GlennNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Bacon v. GrossmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Curtiss v. . JebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haber v. GingoldCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939
  2. People ex rel. Greenhouse v. SheriffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API