Legal Opinion

Aseltine v. Leto Construction Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1972No. Docket 12400PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The only question raised in this appeal is whether defendant Leto Construction Company is liable, as plaintiffs "last employer”, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Plaintiff, a brick mason, had worked in the building trades for many years and for many employers. Over the years he developed a condition known as chronic epicondylitis, popularly known as "tennis elbow”. Increased discomfort and pain resulted in surgery, stripping a tendon, in 1966. Plaintiff was employed by Leto, as a mason, from March 15, 1967, to July 15, 1967. The elbow condition caused him to miss work; plaintiff finally…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Lawrence Baking Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Regis v. Lansing Drop Forge Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Appeal of BriggsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. People v. PeaceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Braxton v. Chevrolet Grey Iron Foundry Division of General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Geathers v. 3V, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Gibbs v. Keebler CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API