Legal Opinion

Jaeger MacHine Co. v. L. B. Smith, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1941No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit for goods which the defendant admits were sold and delivered. A counterclaim was interposed for commissions alleged to be due from the plaintiff to the defendant upon certain sales of plaintiff’s “truck mixers”. The issues were tried by Reese, P. J., without a jury.

During 1937 and 1938, the Jaeger Machine Company located in Columbus, Ohio, was the manufacturer of “truck mixers”, which are concrete mixers built to be mounted on trucks. Tim Jaeger Company entered into a written contract with L.. B. Smith Company of Camp Hill, Cumberland…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Huselton v. Eddie Bald Motor Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Cedar Rapids Auto. & Supply Co. v. Thomas B. Jeffrey & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smyth Sales, Inc. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Albright v. KalbitzerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API