Legal Opinion

Wachtel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 11, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*671OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and claim dismissed.

Plaintiff instituted this action for reimbursement for the cost of a manual wheelchair that he purchased for his wife on November 25, 1985 at a cost of $532. Plaintiff’s wife suffers from multiple sclerosis and needs a wheelchair to be ambulatory. Plaintiff submitted a claim to defendant, his major medical provider, for a motorized wheelchair. That claim was approved and the benefits paid. Thereafter, plaintiff submitted a paid bill in the amount of $532 for a manual (nonmotorized) wheelchair.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. CityWide Social Work & Psychological Services, P.L.L.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2004
  2. Wait v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Saxe v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1994
  4. Steven S. v. GHICivil Court of the City of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API