Legal Opinion
Blaich v. Van Herwynen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 6, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief and two stipulations of settlement dated December 7, 2006 and January 9, 2007, respectively, from so much of an amended order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated August 9, 2005, as denied those branches of his motion which were for summary *388judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Peter Van Herwynen, Jr., and for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Peter Van Herwynen, Jr., upon his failure to appear or answer the complaint.
Ordered that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Lili B. v. Henry F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Hughes v. FarreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Bazazian v. LogattoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of New York v. College Point Sports Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Maiello v. KirchnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Morrow v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Strychalski v. DaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- DaimlerChrysler Insurance v. JennemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.