Legal Opinion
In the Interest of K.M.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 14, 2002No. 02-0319PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The juvenile court terminated the parental rights of the biological parents of K.M. pursuant to Iowa Code section 232.116(1)</) and (i) (Supp.2001). The Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the termination order, finding clear and convincing evidence that the requirements of section 232.116(l)(i) were met. The court of appeals also rejected the parents’ constitutional challenge to Iowa Code section 232.116(2). This court granted further review. Upon our examination and consideration of the record, we affirm. See generally In re C.B., 611 N.W.2d 489, 492 (Iowa *6052000) (“We review…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In the Interest of DameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SeeringSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Vania Minor, Individually and as Mother, Natural Guardian and Next Best Friend of D.A. v. State of Iowa, Becky Grabe, Individually and Cleo Hester, IndividuallySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- In Re P.L.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- In the Interest of H.S. And S.N., Minor Children, V.R., MotherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- In the Interest of L.M.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.