Legal Opinion
United States v. Panduro
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 31, 2001No. 00 CR 107(SAS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Defendant Mario Panduro has moved for downward departures based on extraordinary family circumstances and Application Note 15 to United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2D1.1. In addition, Panduro has argued for a minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). Lastly, Panduro has objected to the Government’s determination of drug quantity. Because there were disputed issues of fact, a Fatico hearing was held where tape recordings of a number of conversations between Panduro and others were received in evidence. Both parties submitted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Cynthia JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Didier Alba John Gonzalez Marizol Vasquez, John GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. John Stanley, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Luis Fernando Correa-VargasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Mohammad Ajmal, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Muhammad Afzal and Hassan Sabghat UllahkhanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Goodwin, Darrel A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- United States v. PanduroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. SorianoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003