Legal Opinion

Alston v. United States

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided January 9, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOPER, Chief Judge.

In this case motion for summary judgment has been made by both plaintiffs and the defendant and the facts are not in dispute.

The sole question at issue is whether or not, as contended by the plaintiffs, the administration expenses incurred by the Estate of Charles Loridans should be, for purposes of ascertaining the estate tax, charged against certain bequests, or whether (as contended by the Government) they should be charged against the residue of the estate devised to charity, and consequently constituting a deduction in connection with computation of such estate taxes.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Estate of Edward H. Luehrmann, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. Elizabeth P. Ballantine, as Executors of the Estate of Percy Ballantine, Deceased v. Laurie W. Tomlinson, as District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Waldrop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Rust, Johnston & Co. v. BillingsleaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philip H. Alston, Jr., and the Citizens and Southern National Bank, Executors of the Estate of Charles Loridans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Harris v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Harris v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API