Blueshift, Inc. v. Advanced Computing Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Presiding Judge.
In this appeal, we must decide whether the trial court correctly interpreted a contract executed by Blueshift, Inc. and Advanced Computing Technologies, Inc. (“ACT”). Because we conclude that the trial court interpreted the contract incorrectly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment in favor of ACT.
Blueshift, a company whose primary business is software development, contracted with its client, E-Panacea.com, to custom build specific software modules. Blueshift lacked certain programming skills, and it located a programmer through a search on the internet. The programmer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Horwitz v. WeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Asian Square Partners, L.P. v. Cuong Quynh LyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Kwickie/Flash Foods, Inc. v. Lakeside Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Patellis v. 100 Galleria Parkway AssocicatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of Pitts v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Quality Foods, Inc. v. SmithbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- American Management Services East, LLC v. Fort Benning Family Communities, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd. v. Network Billing Systems, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Toy Wright Ventures, LLC v. Radalo Foods, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.