Legal Opinion

United States v. Nynex Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 16, 1993No. Cr. 90-0238 (HHG)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

Defendant NYNEX Corporation was indicted for criminal contempt under 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) for allegedly violating Section 11(D)(1) of the decree entered by this Court in United States v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 552 F.Supp. 131 (D.D.C.1982). 1 After numerous pretrial motions were resolved, 2 a bench trial was conducted, and both parties thereafter submitted proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. For the reasons set forth below, the Court concludes that NYNEX is guilty of criminal contempt. 3

I

NYNEX, as one of the Regional Companies spun off in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  4. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. a & P Trucking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Samuel H. McMahon Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Samuel H. McMahon Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API