Legal Opinion

Capital National Bank v. Bartley

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. 7,484Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Appeal by the Capital National Bank of St. Paul from a judgment dismissing.its action to compel the estate of P. B. Bartley, deceased, to contribute, pro rata with Bartley’s co-stockholders in the Conrad Trust & Savings Bank of Helena, toward the satisfaction of a judgment secured by it and against the Conrad Bank, under the following circumstances:

Prior to 1923 the “Pondera Yalley Corporation” was indebted to this plaintiff in a sum of approximately $25,000, for the payment of which the corporation had pledged its capital stock, and was also indebted to the Conrad Bank in an undisclosed sum.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Chase v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Ward v. JoslinSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Schrader v. Manufacturers' Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API