Legal Opinion

Griauzde v. Nashua

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 27, 1961No. 4961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The plaintiffs’ position is that there was no new evidence presented at the rehearing so as to warrant the change of vote by the zoning board of adjustment granting the defendant Soucy a variance.

Article IX, s. 45(6) of the Nashua zoning ordinance provides that in order to grant a variance the board must find as follows:

“a. No diminution of value of surrounding properties would be suffered.
“b. Granting the permit would be of benefit to the public interest.
“c. Denial of the permit would result in unnecessary hardship on the owner seeking it. •
“d. By granting the permit, substantial justice…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nash v. Warren Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Pappas v. City of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Churchill v. ZONING BD. OF CUMBERLANDSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API