Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Adelango Trucking
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 2011PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*408Defendants established, prima facie, that the infant plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the 2006 vehicular accident, through the submission of affirmed reports of medical experts, who, upon examination, found that plaintiff had normal ranges of ankle motion and had recovered from an ankle sprain without any disability (see Canelo v Genolg Tr., Inc., 82 AD3d 584 [2011]). Moreover, other submissions, including the bill of particulars and plaintiff’s deposition, which stated that he missed less than six days of school, sufficiently refuted his 90/ 180-day claim (see…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lopez v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- DeJesus v. PaulinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Williams v. Baldor Specialty Foods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Canelo v. Genolg Transit, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Torres v. DwyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dorrian v. CantalicioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rampersaud v. EljamaliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Angeles v. Versace Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Ampofo v. KeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Angeles v. Versace Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.