Legal Opinion

Norton v. Birmingham Fertilizer Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. J. S. Williams. Assumpsit by the Birmingham Fertilizer Company against Katie Norton and another. Judgment for plaintiff and the named defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Assumpsit by the Birmingham Fertilizer Company against Katie Norton and another. Judgment for plaintiff and the named defendant appeals. Affirmed. (1) This appeal is prosecuted from the judgment of the circuit court rendered in an action on a promissory note against the appellant and another; and while the record does not show that summons was issued to the defendant who did not join in the appeal as required by the statute (Acts 1911, p. 589, amending section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Andalusia Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Daniel v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Vaughan v. HigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Rogers v. WhittleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. GramlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API