Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Matar

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 2011No. C032405DRC; A143331Published

1Opinion of the Court

ROSENBLUM, S. J.

Father appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his motion to modify child support for the reason that the parties’ stipulated judgment of dissolution prevented them from seeking a modification. We conclude, as did the trial court, that enforcement of the agreement did not violate public policy and that the trial court did not err in dismissing father’s motion, and we affirm.

The parties were divorced in March 2005, after seven years of marriage. They have two minor children who were ages four and six at the time of dissolution. The stipulated general judgment of dissolution…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Marriage of Mock v. ScevaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API