Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Murphy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 30, 2003No. 1021703Published

1Opinion of the Court

886 So.2d 90 (2003)

Ex parte James R. MURPHY.

(In re James R. Murphy

v.

Mary J. Murphy Benvenuto).

1021703.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

December 30, 2003.

Walter L. Gray III and Jeremy W. Armstrong of Armstrong & Gray, P.C., Phenix City, for petitioner.

Connie Cooper, Phenix City, for respondent.

STUART, Justice.

James R. Murphy and Mary J. Murphy Benvenuto divorced in April 1998. Incorporated into the parties' final judgment of divorce was a settlement agreement that provided as follows:

"11. [Benvenuto] shall be awarded $1,500.00 per month as periodic alimony. The award of periodic alimony shall not be…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Ex Parte AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Odom v. HullSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Justice v. ARAB LUMBER AND SUPPLY, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API