Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Tullahoma v. Coffee County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1964No. 15078_1Published

1DissentWeick, Circuit Judge

With all due respect, I do not believe that Congress ever intended the result reached here. As I read the 1940 amendment to Section 13, no obligation was imposed upon TVA to provide for tax equivalent payments in its contracts with municipalities, but if such payments are provided they must be “conditioned upon a proper distribution by the municipality of any amounts collected by it in lieu of State or county taxes upon any such distribution system or property * *

The majority’s holding in this case permits a municipality to include in the rates, which it charges to users of electricity, sums…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rutherford County v. City of MurfreesboroTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority Polk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1945
  3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API