Legal Opinion

Cadle Co. v. Fletcher

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 14, 2015No. 14-3404-cvPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents an unsettled question of Connecticut law regarding the interpretation of Conn. GemStat. §§ 52-361a and 52-367b1 — specifically, whether those sections exempt a judgment debtor’s post-garnishment, residual wages held in a third party’s bank account from further execu*200tion, so that they are freely transferable under the Connecticut Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 52-552a et seq. We believe it is more appropriate for the Connecticut Supreme Court to address this matter in the first instance, because it is in a better position than this Court to determine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Munn Ex Rel. C.M. v. Hotchkiss SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. In re Darlene C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. FletcherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Cadle Co. v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. Cadle Co. v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Hernandez v. Apple Auto Wholesalers of Waterbury LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API