Legal Opinion

Noe v. Moseley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1941No. 26041. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

Anna Noe (now Hunt) filed a complaint in the circuit court of Richland county. It is entitled a bill to construe a deed to certain real estate but it is in reality a bill to quiet title. The deed involved was from M. J. Noe and Henrietta Noe, his wife, and recited that they “convey and warrant to Charles Noe” certain described real estate. Immediately after the description was the following: “This conveyance is made on express condition that grantee his heirs and assigns shall not sell or convey or in anywise encumber the above described lands without the written consent of the grantors;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sandberg v. GrabsIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hartwick v. HeberlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Seymour v. BowlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Webbe v. WebbeIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Lee v. RobersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. GrubbIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. ShellabergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re Estate of FahnestockIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hofing v. WillisIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Orme v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API