Legal Opinion

United States v. Norman Phillip Conner and Samuel Nolan Mann

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 23, 1973No. 72-1094PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELL, Circuit Judge.

A two-count indictment charged Norman Conner and Samuel Mann with violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2312 and 2313. A jury found the defendants not guilty on the first count but guilty of the section 2313 charge, receiving and concealing a stolen Chevrolet automobile which was moving as interstate commerce knowing the car to have been stolen. Conner was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment, Mann to five.

The primary issue raised by the defendants on this appeal is whether the district court erred in denying their pre-trial motion to suppress and reject all evidence obtained by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sam Schwachter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. United States v. Charles H. SokolowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Robert Michael HanahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. United States v. Oscar Mancillas and Charles LowryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. David Carson Jackson, United States of America v. Margaret Frances McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  4. Robert Fixel v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Hipolito Cruz PaganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API