Legal Opinion

Decamillis v. Hasiotis, No. Fa00-0630369 (Sep. 5, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 5, 2001No. FA00-0630369Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The present issue before the court is the State's motion to dismiss the defendant's cross-complaint. The motion has inaugurated a flurry of motions and cross-motions by the parties.1 For the reasons hereinafter stated the motion to dismiss the crosscomplaint is denied.

The action commenced with a paternity petition brought by the State of Connecticut pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-162. It is alleged that the defendant is the father of a minor child, Selina DeCamillis, born to the named…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Community Collaborative of Bridgeport, Inc. v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. In re Jonathan M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Steeneck v. University of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Doe v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API