Legal Opinion

Chipman v. McClellan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 21, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

The first case is a writ of entry to recover possession of two parcels of land in Medford. The demandant is the assignee in insolvency of the joint and several estates of Dudley Hall and Dudley C. Hall, partners doing business under the name of Dudley Hall and Company, who were adjudged insolvent debtors on March 23,1891. The tenant claims title under a deed from Dudley C. Hall, dated December 15, 1890, and delivered two days later. The tenant was at the time of the conveyance a director of and counsel for the Traders’ National Bank, and the *366consideration of the conveyance was an indebtedness…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Waite v. DowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Forbes v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McClellan v. ChipmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Bailey v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. In re Virginia Hardwood Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1905
  4. Spencer v. NewtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
  5. Bardes v. First National Bank of HawardenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API