Legal Opinion

Wilkins & Bussard Architects v. Carey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 20, 1972No. 55123PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff’s action at law for professional services and materials alleged to have been furnished to defendant was tried to the court. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff has appealed. We affirm.

The trial court found plaintiff was employed by Carey Brothers Seed and Nursery, Inc., a corporation, not a party herein and concluded defendant, Rudy D. Carey, was not personally responsible for plaintiff’s claim. On this appeal plaintiff asserts the trial court erred in so finding and entering judgment accordingly.

I. In a law action tried to the court, as here, our review is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alsco Iowa, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WyantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. Morf v. WashburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. Omaha Standard, Inc. v. NissenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Cryder Well Company v. StanglSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmers Savings Bank v. WMBIC Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API