Legal Opinion

Beliew v. Stuttgart Rice Mill

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1998No. CA 98-525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendel L. Griffen, Judge.

David Beliew brings this appeal from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission and challenges whether the Commission correctly (1) determined the proper compensation rate, (2) found that the Death and Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund’s liability for payments did not begin until December 1997, and (3) found that additional payments made by Stuttgart Rice Mill, without modification of the award, are not gratuitous payments. We affirm the Commission on all points.

Beliew worked at Stuttgart Rice Mill on January 2, 1987, when he suffered a compensable injury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HuxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Arkansas Vinegar Co. v. AshbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Perry v. Leisure Lodges, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Hill v. CGR Medical Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Montgomery v. Delta AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Castleberry v. Elite Lamp Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. O'Hara v. J. Christy Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Shaver v. Ashley Cnty. Detention Ctr.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  4. O'Hara v. J. Christy Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API