Legal Opinion

Kingsbury v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided March 1, 2000No. 10-99-172-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL VANCE, Justice.

Irving Kingsbury was convicted of deadly conduct and making a terroristic threat. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. §§ 22.05, 22.07 (Vernon 1994). He was sentenced to 180 days for the terroristic threat and one year in jail plus a $2,000 fine for the deadly conduct. Kingsbury brings three issues for appellate review, asserting that: 1) the court erred in admitting evidence; 2) the court erred in making prejudicial statements concerning that evidence; and 3) the evidence is legally insufficient to support the verdict. Finding no error and finding the evidence sufficient to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Lane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Dues v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Druery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Dossett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  3. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Ennis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  5. Andrew Crawford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API