Legal Opinion

Broderick v. Blunt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 30, 1908No. 17,039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Patrick Broderick against R. P. Blunt. Judgment for defendant was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, and Mrs. Patrick Broderick applies for certiorari or writ of review.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Appeals from the city courts of the parish of Orleans to the Court of Appeal are tried de novo, and the evidence is not reduced to writing. Such appeals may be decided by one of the judges, and written opinions are seldom handed down. It results that, in a case where there is no written opinion and no agreed statement of facts, this court cannot intelligently pass on an application to review a judgment based on the evidence. If the evidence has been taken down by consent, the clerk should so certify. If the evidence is not of record, it is useless for this court to order up a cause to review…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. H. Rice & Son v. PayneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Gaiennie Co. v. BouchereauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Decoy v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API