Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlos San Roman-Zarate

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1997No. 96-6067PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Carlos Roman-Zarate appeals his sixty-month sentence imposed following a plea of guilty to unlawful possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Mr. Zarate challenges the district court’s sentencing calculation, arguing the court improperly considered a post-arrest admission in determining his base offense level and erroneously applied the mandatory minimum sentence. We affirm.

In October 1995, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents in Oklahoma City initiated a drug delivery between Mr. Zarate and a federal…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Roger RutledgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Snow v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Fox v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Hawkins v. HanniganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Leon BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API