In re Appeal of the Township of South Whitehall
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLarsen, Justice
I concur that the sales data and analysis submitted by the taxpayer were properly admitted by the trial court. I dissent, however, from that portion of the majority opinion which directs the trial court, on remand, to determine the common level ratio in light of Keebler Co. v. Board of Revision of Taxes of Philadelphia County, 496 Pa. 140, 436 A.2d 583. Real estate may not be validly divided into classes for the purpose of calculating the common level ratio. See Kenney v. Keebler Co., 53 Pa.Cmwlth. 507, 419 A.2d 210 (1980) (opinion by Wilkinson, J.).
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keebler Co. v. Board of Revision of TaxesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- KENNEY v. Keebler Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980