Legal Opinion
Roy v. Law Offices of B. Alan Seidler, P.C.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided January 3, 2018No. 17 Civ. 5644 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sweet, D.J.
Defendants Law Offices of B. Alan Seidler, PC and B. Alan Seidler, Esq. (the "Seidler Defendants") and Defendant Raymond S. Sussman1 ("Sussman" and, collectively, *456the "Defendants") have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiff Emmanuel Roy ("Roy" or the "Plaintiff"). Based on the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice and Plaintiff shall have 30 days to move to vacate this dismissal for good cause shown.
Procedural History
Plaintiff filed his Complaint on July 25, 2017. Dkt. No. 1 (the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Abbas v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Popat v. LevyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Abdul Q. Awan v. New York Metropolitan Transit Authority, e al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Flores-Mendez v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Herrmann v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- James J. Polidoro v. The Law Firm of Jonathan D'Agostino, P.CDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020