Fred Harrell v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1DissentBarnes, J.
¶20. While I.agree with the majority that the trial court erroneously excluded Harrell’s attempted testimony of Leonard’s alleged threat, I cannot agree that Harrell’s ultimate reference to a generic threat cured the error. The trial court did not allow Harrell to testify as to the specifics of the alleged threat he overheard when Leonard was speaking to Dennis. I find that the prosecutors’ and trial, court’s errors interrupting and precluding Harrell’s testimony when he was trying to present his defense severely prejudiced Harrell. I would reverse and remand for a new trial.
¶ 21. “Hearsay”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keys v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Terry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013