Hafer v. Schauer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mb. Justice Robebts:
Not only is the majority opinion devoid of any authority to support its conclusion that Erie Insurance Exchange is not liable for any interest accruing between the date of verdict and the time of formal entry of judgment, but it also ignores the weight of authority from other jurisdictions. Even more inexplicable is the fact that the majority holds that Erie is liable for less than Erie admits it owes. Certainly, given the well established rule that a contract of insurance is *296construed against the drafter (here Erie), at minimum appellee is entitled to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- River Valley Cartage Co. v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- West Republic Mining Co. v. Jones & LaughlinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.