Legal Opinion

Swing v. American Federation of Labor

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1939No. 25083. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs in this cause are the owner and all of the employees who are jointly conducting a beauty parlor in the city of Chicago, and the cause of their complaint for an injunction arises from interference with that business by the defendants. There is no question of fact for decision as the cause was disposed of on a motion to strike which admitted all facts well pleaded. In the circuit court the motion to dismiss was sustained and the complaint dismissed for want of equity. The Appellate Court reversed this judgment of the circuit court and granted a certificate of importance,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LloydIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc. v. Milk Wagon Drivers' Union of Chicago No. 753Illinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Vulcan Detinning Co. v. St. ClairIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Roth v. Local Union No. 1460 of Retail Clerks UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Employees of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API