Levinson v. Greene
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1] Petitioners’ position that the District Court for the Southern District of California had no power to make the order above described is not tenable. By the terms of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, as amended June 25, 1910, section 2 (Comp. St. § 9586), the courts of bankruptcy are empowered to exercise “ancillary jurisdiction over persons or property within their respective territorial limits in aid of a receiver or trustee appointed in any bankruptcy proceedings pending in any other court of bankruptcy.” In Lazarus v. Prentice, 234 U. S. 263, 34 Sup. Ct.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Holden v. StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hiscock v. MertensSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Bailey v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of MehrerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 1980
- Peoples State Bank & Trust Co. v. Sayler (In Re Sayler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1986