Legal Opinion

State v. Creechley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1904No. 1502PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Second District Court, Morgan County. — How. T. Marioneaux, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, J.

The defendant was charged by information with having committed the crime of perjury. He entered the pleas of “Not guilty” and “Former acquittal.” At the trial the jury returned a verdict of “Guilty as charged in the information,” hut made no finding upon the plea of autrefois acquit, and was discharged. The court afterwards entered judgment of conviction, overruled a motion for a new trial, and passed sentence of imprisonment in the penitentiary. Thereupon the defendant appealed.

1 It is contended for the prisoner that, the jury having failed to make a finding upon the plea of former…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HambergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. KinseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. People v. FuquaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Moody v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HummelUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Storm v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. SpringerUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Storm v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API