Legal Opinion

Midvale Florists v. Keane

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1968No. Appeal, 465PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This appeal reaches us from au order affirming an award of arbitrators, as amended. It is agreed that this was common law arbitration and not under the Act of April 25, 1927, P. L. 381, 5 P.S. §161 et seq.

The two litigants, Thomas F. Keane, Jr., appellant, and Camillo Lupinacci, appellee, were partners engaged in the retail florist business, doing business as Midvale Florists, under a written agreement which provided for the settlement by arbitration of any disagreements arising from the conduct of the business, its dissolution, etc. A dispute having arisen between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Keller v. Local 249 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Owens v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. L. B. Marks Construction Co. v. Middlesex Twp. Municipal Authority, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API