Legal Opinion

Casey v. . Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNck, J.

Tbe findings of fact are amply supported by competent evidence, and were therefore binding upon tbe Superior Court and upon this Court. Public Laws 1929, cb. 120, sec. 60 (N. C. Code of 1939 [Micbie], 8081 [ppp]); Early v. Basnight & Co., 214 N. C., 103, 198 S. E., 577; Saunders v. Allen, 208 N. C., 189, 179 S. E., 754; Buchanan v. Highway Commission, 217 N. C., 173, 7 S. E. (2d), 382.

Tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act is applicable to tbe State School Commission and to county and city administrative school units. Cb. 358, see. 22, Public Laws 1939. Tbe pertinent portion of said section of said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Early v. W. H. Basnight & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Saunders v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnhardt v. Yellow Cab CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Hixson v. Sears Roebuck Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API