Trump Empire State Partners v. Empire State Building Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered October 29, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The contract claims were properly dismissed because they will be addressed in other litigation (CPLR 3211 [a] [4]). Since substantial identity of parties (see, Employers Ins. v Primerica Holdings, 199 AD2d 178) and “essential” identity of issue (see, Parker v Rich, 140 AD2d 177) were demonstrated, dismissal of the agreement-based claims was a proper exercise of discretion (see, Morgulas v…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garland v. Titan West AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Morgulas v. J. Yudell Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Parker v. RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pagano v. CohenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001