Legal Opinion

State v. Hoyle

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2004No. 30084Published

1Opinion of the Court

99 P.3d 1069 (2004)

140 Idaho 679

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Richard W. HOYLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 30084.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, April 2004 Term.

July 21, 2004.

Order Denying Rehearing October 28, 2004.

Andrew Parnes, Ketchum, and Peterson Law Offices, Boise, for Appellant. Andrew Parnes argued.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Kenneth K. Jorgensen argued.

KIDWELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a denial of a Motion for Judgment of Acquittal after a jury trial where the district court ruled a mistrial as to Count B, racketeering. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API