Legal Opinion

Storms v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 26, 2005No. 55288-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*822¶1 A dog qualifies as a service animal within the meaning of the applicable state statute and administrative code provision if it is trained to assist or accommodate a person’s sensory, mental, or physical disability. This court has interpreted this provision to require that there be some evidence of individual training that sets the animal apart from the ordinary pet, a requirement to which we adhere. And, because there was testimony at trial that Sherry Storms’ dog was trained to put herself between Storms and other people so as to keep an open area around Storms and alleviate her anxiety…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Prindable v. Association of Apartment Owners of 2987 KalakauaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
  3. Timberlane Mobile Home Park v. Human Rights Commission ex rel. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Timberlane Mobile Home Park v. STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COM'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lucas v. Riverside Park Condominiums Unit Owners Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Association of Apartment Owners of Liliuokalani Gardens v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  3. G. v. SAUCON VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API