Legal Opinion

Hirschhorn v. Funding.Com

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 2, 2006No. 4D05-4028Published

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion fob Rehearing

2Per curiam

We grant rehearing, withdraw our previously issued opinion and substitute the following in its place.

Affirmed. The appellants make a post-judgment challenge based on the judge’s recusal upon the appellants’ request after the final judgment was entered. At most, the previously entered judgment was merely voidable and not void. Schlesinger v. Chemical Bank, 707 So.2d 868 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Murphy v. State, 627 So.2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Barber v. MacKenzie, 562 So.2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Appellants had to move for reconsideration of the already entered final…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barber v. MacKenzieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Schlesinger v. Chemical BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API