Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1931No. Docket No. 168, Calendar No. 35,268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNoeth, J.

The main question presented on this appeal is clearly outlined and a proper decision reached in the following portion of the circuit judge’s opinion:

“In this cause plaintiff filed her bill to foreclose a lien on certain real estate belonging to defendant, alleging that said lien was established in a divorce decree made May 8, 1928, in this court, and that there is now due upwards of $400. Defendant answered admitting these facts, but alleging that since the entry of said decree the identical parties have remarried, and that therefore the lien has become abrogated. * * *
“The facts as agreed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kistler v. KistlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Mallory's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Carson v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Brenner v. BrennerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hagerty v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API