Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lott v. Dashiell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 28, 1921No. 6588Published

Error from District Court, Bexar County; J. T. Sluder, Judge. Suit by Jas. Polk against D. D. Harrigan and J. N. Lott, in which Mrs. C. L. Dashiell was substituted as plaintiff and in which Sabino Sandoval and others intervened. Erom judgment for plaintiffs, J. N. Lott and others bring error.

1Dissent

DICKSON, Special Justice

(dissenting).

I concur in the affirmance of this case as to the interveners, F. S. Sandoval et al., but am unable to agree with the majority opinion that the cause should be reversed and remanded as to plaintiff in error Lott, D. D. Harrigan, and W. R. and B. K. Edwards.

To the statement of the case made in the majority opinion it should be added that plaintiff in error Lott also pleaded that he and the defendant Harrigan formed a partnership for the purchase, subdivision, and sale of the land in .controversy; that the $4,000 note represented the agreed purchase price of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Smith v. Traders National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Mansel v. CastlesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sanders v. BridgesTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. Sherman Hotel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API