Farago v. Sluke

90 N.J. Super. 356 (1966)

217 A.2d 630

EMILY J. FARAGO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF JULIUS FARAGO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

JOHN PETER SLUKE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 21, 1966.

Decided March 4, 1966.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. Peter A. DeSarno argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Seaman, Williams & Seaman, attorneys).

Mr. Frank Fink argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Albert M. Neiss, attorney).

Plaintiff's contention that there was prejudicial error in permitting defendant's witness Hendley to…