Legal Opinion

In Re Crandall

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided July 21, 2006No. 06-01696-8W7PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER SUSTAINING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO PROPERTY CLAIMED AS EXEMPT UNDER NEW YORK LAW, ALLOWING EXEMPTION UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(2), AND GRANTING TRUSTEE’S AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL TURNOVER OF AUTOMOBILE

MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

Under section 522(b)(3)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, as amended by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, a debtor is entitled to claim exemptions in the state “in which the debtor’s domicile has been located for the 730 days preceding the date of the filing of the petition.... ” If the debtor’s domicile was not located in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re UnderwoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2006
  2. Coplan Pipe & Supply Co., Inc. v. McCannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Bakst v. Bennett (In Re Bennett)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1997

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re GarrettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  2. Bierbach v. Brooks (In Re Brooks)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. In Re ChandlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2007
  4. In Re WestUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
  5. In Re BeckwithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API