Legal Opinion

Cosmopolitan Mutual Casualty Co. v. Monarch Concrete Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

The appeal is by a third party in a supplementary proceeding (Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc.) from ail affirmance of a civil contempt adjudication. A subpoena had been served on Psaty by the judgment creditor under section 781 of the Civil Practice Act containing a clause forbidding Psaty “ to make or suffer any transfer or other disposition of, or to interfere with, any property belonging to the judgment debtor, or to which he may be entitled or which may thereafter be acquired by or become due to said judgment debtor, or to pay over or otherwise dispose of any moneys due or to become due to such…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Mutual Casualty Co. v. Monarch Concrete Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Nielsen Media Research, Inc. v. Carlton Hotel, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. UBS Securities LLC v. Rae Systems Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. UBS Securities LLC v. Rae Systems Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API